Community-driven reviews
Honest, unfiltered notes from students who actually sat through the class: the projects, the pace, the critique, and what they really learned.
Stop guessing what your next class actually is. Albert is clunky, and course descriptions shouldn’t be riddles.
Course descriptions shouldn’t be riddles.
The aspect radar
Every review rates six dimensions: physical computing, coding, design, narrative, fabrication and sound. Averaged together, they show at a glance what a class really demands.
Wishlist & track
Star what you’re curious about, mark what you’ve taken. Your dashboard turns taken courses into a review queue, so giving back takes two minutes.
Portfolio BuilderSelf-Taught HeavyCrit HeavySoloReading HeavyEasy AGroup-work HeavyPComp Heavy
Community tags
Tag what actually matters, like “Portfolio Builder”, “Crit Heavy” or “Self-Taught Heavy”, then filter the whole catalogue by the things that fit how you learn.
How the numbers work
Aspects · 0 to 5
How much of each a course asks of you. A course page shows the average of every review.
- PComp
- Coding
- Design
- Narrative
- Fabrication
- Sound
Style · 1 to 5
Two spectra place the course: is it discussion or making, and how hard does it push?
SeminarProduction
ChillGrind
Points & badges
- +10for each review posted under your name
- +15instead, if you’re the first to review a course
- +5every time someone marks your review helpful
- 0for anonymous reviews, still hugely appreciated
- Pioneer among the first 100 reviewers
- Lifesaver a review received 20+ Helpful votes
- Tag Master contributed 50+ tags across reviews
- Sentinel submitted 10+ reviews
- First Reviewer first to review a course
Reading a cover
Every course cover is drawn from its reviews. The course code fixes the layout; the data sets the amounts.
Grey: not reviewed yet
Hue
what it demands
Resolution
number of reviews
Grain
workload
Solid vs open
course style